Off the Cuff: Pricing Practices in Contract Embroidery

A review of online embroidery prices may help you determine whether your prices are too low, too high or just right.
May 12, 2008

By Mark L. Venit, MBA

Wouldn't it be nice to know what contract embroidery companies around the country are charging for their services to the trade so that you can determine whether your prices are competitive? Well, it's easy to find out by simply investing a few minutes on Google, as I did in researching this column. To say the least, the scope of trade pricing is rather broad.


Price Wars
What I did was investigate about 30 Web sites, using break points at 48, 72, 144, 288, and 576 units for 7,000 stitches done on one location of a standard garment (mainly tees and polos). While there are likely other vendors not disclosing their pricing on the Internet and who have rates below or above the pack, some general ranges emerged:
•    The lowest pricing I found, from a contract embroiderer in Texas, was $1.75/M across the board in the above quantities from four dozen to four gross — or $0.25/M.
•    Excluding rates well above the grouping, pricing to-the-trade in the four dozen range runs from $2.37 ($0.34/M) up to $5.00 ($0.71/M), with most of the pricing falling into a standard deviation of $2.40 to $3.50 ($0.34/M to $0.50/M).
•    At the six dozen range, pricing tightens to between $2.10 and $2.89 for most vendors ($0.30/M to $0.41/M).
•    At a gross, there is, as you'd expect, further tightening and slightly reduced fares — between $2.05 and $2.59 ($0.30/M to $0.37/M).
•    At two gross, prices trim down by another penny and yet another penny at four gross on the high and low ends of the group.

While these findings don't qualify as a rigorously determined, empirical study, the numbers do hold up under the lens of my personal observation and experience in the field. So, as a general rule, buyers can expect to pay between $0.30/M to $0.40/M for contract embroidery in most quantities from four dozen and up. As for contract pricing for less than four dozen units within the trade, they expect to pay another five to ten cents per thousand stitches.

Because you don't know your competitor's cost structure, there's a danger, of course, to setting prices solely on the competition, but here's an example of a company that's got a good handle on embroidery pricing and whose practices might be used as a barometer to gauge your own approach.

Case Study
Great Wall Emblem, a division of Northwest Embroidery (NWE), with production operations in both the United States and China, sells contract embroidery to the trade and end users as well, but with separate pricing for the trade and retail. (End users who bring in their goods to NWE in Milton, Wash., for contract work pay about twice the trade price and are subject to handling charges). If you're looking for a national average, though, NWE, in its just-released contract pricing catalog level, is about where I think most contract operations should be pricing their work, though I'd characterize NWE's pricing at about 10% above the pack's mean levels.

That "should be" issue is summed up by CEO Jim Mickelson, who founded the company in 1977, as, "It's where we — and most of our competitors — need to be if we're going to be profitable. Most of us have been charging what we were charging 10 years ago or longer. But when I studied our numbers, I raised our prices by about three to five cents per thousand, and that's just to keep up with what it's costing us right now, which might not be enough in six months."

A quick profile of NWE, in a state with the nation's highest mandated minimum wage — $8.07/hour — shows it runs a hundred heads and that its primary business is full-service sales of embroidered garments, not contract work. "But," explains Mickelson, "we still attract work from the trade, particularly from other embroiderers, screen printers and, of course, ASI-type distributors, who account for more than half of our contract work."

This scenario may seem familiar, but Mickelson is paying his embroidery operators $11-12/hour on average along with good health benefits. With little employee turnover and its embroidery heads busy year-round, Mickelson says, "Yeah, we're a little high, but we meet our deadlines, and we don't play games when [trade buyers] start telling us they can get it (contract work) a nickel or dime [per thousand] cheaper. When we hear that, I ask why they're looking for a new vendor."

The responses, notes Mickelson, are all predictable: Delivery and quality issues top the list, followed by personality issues with the vendor staff or the owner. "So, we can charge a little higher, a) to make money and b), to maintain good turnaround" (usually a week or less).

I know of contract embroiderers here in Maryland, and in New York, New Jersey, Florida and elsewhere, who routinely charge $0.15-$0.17/M, but whose customer list will lose and gain 50% of their accounts each year. If contract work, whether full- or part-time, is a vital part of the services you offer, Mickelson might be telling you what you need to hear.

He hopes everyone will raise prices to at least what he's charging these days. But he's a realist who knows competition is good for everyone, and as he strongly states, "I need the low-ballers. They're my best marketing tool. I know after they've given someone bad service — or shall we say 'disappointing service' — or bad work, the [trade] customers who come to us as a direct result of it are happy to pay more, and we're happy to serve them! Profitably serve them, that is."

PS. Among the low-end prices I found online were those posted by Utah Correctional Industries: $0.26/M at four and six dozen, $0.24/M for one gross and two gross, and $0.23/M at four gross. I'm aware of other penitentiary programs that train prisoners in screen printing and embroidery and provide contract services primary to state agencies, and this arrangement doesn't bother me until these operations creep into the commercial marketplace and compete with private industry — YOU! If I were a Utah businessperson paying taxes, I'd give the state legislature there a piece of my mind about that practice.

Mark L. Venit, MBA, is president of Apparel Graphics Institute Ltd., Ocean Pines, Md., which provides management and marketing consulting and proprietary research to apparel graphics companies throughout the Americas and Europe. He is also the chairman of ShopWorks Software LLC, a provider of industry-specific business software. Venit teaches pricing, strategic marketing, salesmanship and other business management topics at the Imprinted Sportswear Shows. He will be teaching a new all-day workshop, "Getting to the Next Level: Surviving and Thriving in Good Times and Bad," at ISS New England, Schaumburg and Fort Worth. You can reach him at markvenit@cs.com.

Off the Cuff: Confidentiality Agreements
Confidentiality agreements protect more than your assets. Just as importantly, they protect your customers.
Some of you might recall a column I published last November that addressed how to keep contract customers out of your production area in order to protect your work. This week's column looks at the other side of the same coin -- employee confidentiality agreements. These are legal agreements that are intended to keep your employees from talking about who's placing orders, for what quantities and dollars, what's being produced and who the end-user might.
September 15, 2008

Off the Cuff: How to Charge for Rush Service
Charging for rush service is justifiable, but be sure to outline  policies upfront and inform your customers.
The issues of whether and what to charge for rush service are common in the decorated apparel industry and there are valid arguments on all sides. Most companies feel they’re entitled to some degree of additional compensation for going our of their way to accommodate a rush order, for bumping other customers a notch or two back in the production line and for having to deal with the potential hazards of doing something faster than necessary. Oh, and the more sanguine reason: you can, if you choose, stick it to ’em when they’re on the ropes.
August 29, 2008

How to Profit from the Tax Write-Off for Conventions and Trade Shows
Thanks to Uncle Sam, you can deduct certain trade show and conference expenses from your income tax filing. Learn what’s deductible — and what’s not.
Imagine an enjoyable — and educational — vacation with Uncle Sam picking up part of the tab. That's right, every decorated apparel business, the owner and employees of that business (even someone who is a shareholder/employee), can legitimately claim an income tax deduction for the expenses paid or incurred in attending trade shows, conventions and meetings.
August 18, 2008

Tax Breaks for Education — What Every Decorated Apparel Business Owner Needs to Know
Embroiderers, screen printers and promotional products distributors can profit from breaks in the tax code to educate their employees and themselves.
Finding, hiring, training and retaining “smart” workers have long been key factors in the success of small businesses, including decorated apparel companies. Lawmakers have also recognized the importance of a smarter workforce and created a number of educational and training-related tax breaks and incentives. Those tax benefits allow every commercial embroidery, screen printing and promotional products business, large or small, to offer training and education as a “fringe benefit.”
August 04, 2008

Economic Stimulus Package Offers Tax Break for Equipment Buying
Decorators interested in expanding their business or replacing old equipment can rejoice in the new round of government incentives designed to help small business owners.
Earlier this year, Congress passed, and the President signed, the Economic Stimulus Package of 2008, a $168 billion economic “rescue” package that included rebates for taxpayers and tax breaks for businesses. In addition to those tax rebates, the heart of the package, there also were tax breaks for businesses such as decorated apparel operations — breaks retroactive to the beginning of 2008!
July 21, 2008